Reading Time: 2 minutes The Impossible Burger, unlike beef, contains no hormones or antibiotics Credit: Impossible Foods
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Impossible Foods has quickly become one of the biggest plant-based meat brands in the world. But, is it healthy? And is it healthier than meat?

The Impossible Burger has been applauded for its environmental benefits – using 96 percent less land, 87 percent less water, and 89 percent less greenhouse gas emissions than beef.

But when it comes to health – opinions are stirred.

Is the Impossible Burger healthy?

Renowned physician and bestselling author Dr. Michael Greger has recently published a video comparing the Impossible Burger to animal-beef.

“Plant-based burgers win when it comes to trans fat and cholesterol,” he states.

“We all know trans fat is a serious potential risk factor for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and diabetes. But, it’s also been recently associated with symptoms of depression, lower testosterone, and dementia.

“Higher levels of trans fats in the blood are associated with up to 50 percent higher risk of developing dementia including Alzheimer’s.”

Dr. Greger also states that any intake level of trans fat above 0 percent can increase cholesterol concentration and is not advised.

Is the Impossible Burger healthier than meat?

He also says the Impossible Burger, unlike beef, contains no hormones, no antibiotics, and isn’t designated as ‘probably cancer-causing’ by the World Health Organization. 

However, he does point out that an Impossible Patty contains 370 mg of sodium. This around a quarter of the American Heart Association’s 1500mg daily upper sodium limit. 

When it comes to saturated fat, Greger says beef and the Impossible Burger both contain 8g of saturated. 

“But these do seem to be outliers,” he then adds. “The largest study of the nutritional value of plant-based meats to date [shows] saturated fat levels of similar products only average about two grams per serving – much better than the animal-based equivalent.

‘Processing plants can eliminate 90% of the fiber, but processing plants through animals eliminate 100% of the fiber’.

‘Proccessing plants can eliminate fiber’

“Well, if you look at the fiber content, for example, yes, to see any fiber in a burger is a good thing. But compare that to a whole food… If you ate the same amount of protein from yellow peas, there’d be almost no saturated fat and sodium and a whopping 20 grams of fiber.

So yes, processing plants can eliminate 90 percent of the fiber – but processing plants through animals eliminate 100 percent of the fiber.”

Dr. Greger concluded that while dietary guidelines should continue to emphasize a diet rich in plant-based foods such as nuts, seeds, and legumes, but when it comes to opting for Impossible Burger over beef: it’s a ‘no brainer’. 

‘Substantially better for consumers’

Last year, Impossible Foods CEO Pat Brown responded to critics who claim the brand’s patties are unhealthy.

In an interview with CNBC Make It, Brown said its products are ‘substantially better for consumers than what it replaces’.

“It replaces a burger made from a cow, not a kale salad. So, if you’re saying this isn’t the ultimate ‘superfood’ – you’re right,” he argued.

“But it’s intended to be a product that is healthier for the consumer than a burger made from a cow [and it’s] better for the planet than a burger made from a cow. And for many consumers, [it’s] more delicious.”

RELATED: Is Beyond Meat Healthy? And Is It Healthier Than Meat?

Liam Gilliver

Liam is the Deputy Editor and Social Media Coordinator for Plant Based News. He has written for a number of top publications including Gay Times, Attitude Magazine, Oh Comely, and The Huffington Post - and is the author of 'We're Worried About Him'.