two monkeys A zoo in Essex may euthanize its animals amid the cost of living crisis - Media Credit: Adobe Stock

UK Zoo Keeping Monkeys And Meerkats Considers Euthanizing Animals

The animals kept at Sealife, Southend, may be killed due to the cost of living crisis


3 Minutes Read

The owner of a “zooquarium” in Essex has said that he may have to euthanize his animals due to the cost of living crisis.

Phillip Miller keeps tropical fish, monkeys, meerkats, and other animals at Sealife Adventure in Southend, all of whom require a great deal of resources to live. 

He told ITV News that the annual cost of electricity at the establishment has tripled – from £240,000 to around £750,000. He said that it would be too costly to keep the animals if the zooquarium were closed to save money.

“All these animals have to keep warm – or cold – or a combination of both, and it’s on 24/7, seven days a week,” he explained. “And they have to be fed, so it’s a massive bill to maintain.”

Miller said that they’d either have to be euthanized or sent to other homes. When the interviewer pointed out that it could be hard to find homes for the animals, Miller responded: “That’s the trouble. All the other zoos are going to be in the same boat, I’d imagine.”

Zoos hit by the cost of living

Miller’s isn’t the only zoo to be impacted by the ongoing cost of living crisis in the UK. 

Also this month, one Sussex zoo said that animal welfare could be impacted by the high energy prices. “It all comes down to their welfare,” Mark Kenward, of Drusillas Wildlife Park in East Sussex, told ITV. “We have to be able to keep them at their natural temperatures to sustain their exotic bodies.”

Kenward also said that his energy bills had risen by 70 percent and that they were likely to climb even higher. 

The owner of Chester Zoo, Jamie Christon, recently said that its annual energy bills look set to double from £1.5 million to £3 million. He told the iPaper, “I can’t put a woolly jumper on a Komodo dragon – I have to maintain the temperatures these animals thrive in.”

“I have large, very well-heated or very well-ventilated habitats around the zoo… Those animals and plants have to be maintained whether it is cold, hot, wet or dry.”

He added that, while some people still have money now, they are being careful with how they spend it. 

“Next year they probably won’t have that money,” he continued. 

Animals in unnatural environments

Campaigners have been highlighting the animal welfare costs of zoos for years, and the current situation facing them could be seen as further proof that these beings don’t belong there. 

Zoo animals are forced into unnatural habitats and don’t get a say in who they live with, mate with, and how they spend their time. 

They are often seen as living exhibits, rather than beings with a right to freedom, and are at the mercy of the humans who “own” them.

Many organizations consistently campaign against zoos, including Born Free, PETA, and Freedom for Animals.

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.


The Author

Polly Foreman

Polly is the Deputy Editor of Plant Based News. She has been vegan since 2014, and has written extensively on veganism, animal rights, and the environment.

More by Polly Foreman iconography/arrow-right


Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Notify of

1 Comment
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
22 days ago

Put an animal in between a human and a dollar bill, and you can kiss the animal good-bye. There is absolutely NOTHING humans won’t do to other animals. Yet, we have been designated “Stewards of Creation”!

We want to ban zoos…. But animals are still property, and the property “owners” — whether scientists in a laboratory; agribusiness CEOs on the factory farm; or the management of rodeos, circuses, and zoos — have every right to do what they wish to animal bodies. The legal rationale are two-fold: any act causing animal suffering is acceptable so long as it is part of a “tradition” of animal exploitation and/or has some “rational” purpose such as making profit or “disciplining” an animal. Thus, while the burning or beating of a cat or dog is a felony crime in many states, this is so because it has no redeemable utilitarian function for society, not because it is intrinsically wrong. Where animals are property, the property rights of individual animal “owners” trump public moral concerns, such as voiced by animal advocacy groups, and many a just battle has been lost in the courts through an exploiter’s appeal to “ownership” rights over animals.–from Dr. Steven Best’s essay “Legally Blind: The Case For Granting Animals Rights”

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x