Person holding a Starbucks coffee cup Starbucks employees said the non-dairy surcharge will soon be no more. - Media Credit: Adobe Stock

Starbucks US Reps Reveal Non-Dairy Surcharge Is On Its Way Out

Critics of the so-called "vegan upcharge" say the additional cost has health, environmental, and ethical implications


3 Minutes Read

Audio files sent to Plant Based News (PBN) suggest that Starbucks US customer service representatives were informed of a change in its plant-based milk policy, which was set to take effect as early as May 4.

In calls to the company’s toll-free number, employees said Starbucks would start charging the same for drinks made with plant-based milks. Reps claimed various timelines including “in two weeks” and “an approximate date of May 4.”

Recordings of the calls were submitted to PBN anonymously. To protect the identities of the employees, PBN is not releasing the audio files.

Callers were told to watch for an announcement about the switch on Starbucks’ social media channels.

However, at the time of writing, no such change has been publicized.

Recordings of other reps confirmed the change was being discussed or “on the table,” due, at least in part, to a number of complaints about the added charge. 

“They got quite a bit of pushback for it,” one representative told a caller, saying she was aware the company planned to drop the non-dairy surcharge, but she saw “nothing on paper” about an official date. 

The pressure is on

Starbucks has been under a growing amount of pressure to drop the additional cost, with actor James Cromwell and former Beatle Sir Paul McCartney the latest to call for change.

In December, anti-dairy nonprofit Switch4Good and corporate hoaxers The Yes Men pulled off an elaborate prank claiming Starbucks was dropping the non-dairy upcharge based on the prevalence of lactose intolerance in people of color. The headline-grabbing shenanigan included a realistic-looking but fake website and video. 

Weeks later, Starbucks dropped the plant-based upcharge in the UK, followed by France, Chile, and the Netherlands. It’s not clear whether Switch4Good’s stunt played a role in the decision, but the charity has continued pushing for US locations to follow suit.

Switch4Good published an open letter in the Seattle Times, cosigned by nearly two dozen organizations. It also conducted a hyper-targeted digital media campaign aimed at Starbucks executives, and engaged members of the company’s board of directors by email. 

An opportunity

“Ironically, Starbucks is known for creating smart, planet-friendly policies around so many of its initiatives, like giving 10 cents back to customers who bring in their own reusable cup,” said Switch4Good executive director Dotsie Bausch. “This is another opportunity for the company to show leadership.” 

It has been argued that because plant-based milk production costs more than cow’s milk – particularly in the US where dairy production is heavily subsidized by the government – food businesses (like Starbucks) must pass those costs onto the consumer.

But Bausch notes that Starbucks gives away millions of gallons of free dairy cream every year in its approximately 9,000 US stores.

“If they wanted to save money, they could stop giving away free cow’s milk. As things stand now, people who can’t digest dairy, or don’t for ethical or environmental reasons, are subsidizing lactose lovers.” 

But Starbucks’ recent decision to remove the upcharge from hundreds of its international locations is a good sign, Bausch says.

“If this is what their customer service reps are telling people, it’s clear that public pressure is having an effect,” she added. “So please, please, keep those calls and emails coming, and let Starbucks know that it’s wrong to charge extra for healthier and more sustainable options.”

“It’s wrong for health, for dietary equity, and for the environment.” 

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.


The Author


Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 months ago

I have pretty much stopped going to Starbucks because of the upcharge – other health concerned outlets do NOT upcharge for plant based milk. They need to get with the times! I’m sure I missed it, but an action item here for the reader would be helpful!

4 months ago

I think it is great there is headway with Starbucks getting rid of the upcharge. Now to get other coffee houses like Caribou Coffee to stop with the upcharge.

3 months ago

I am a vegan for seven years now and still counting, excuse my ignorance in this topic, alternative milk is more expensive than non vegan milk? Therefore Starbucks charges more for vegan milk to compensate the investment? Starbucks is not my favorite place to get coffee but I go to human bean coffee, Dutch Bros. Coffee, and Black Rock Coffee all of them charge more for vegan milk, aren’t they charging same as Starbucks?

2 months ago

I won’t go again until my local Starbucks drops the surcharge. That’ll cost them.

1 month ago

The surcharge is so popular cause in a store plant milk is more expensive than regular milk, and it’s common to think that vegan/gluten free people are richer than other and thay can affore for surcharge.
By the way, I’m a vegan and I’m for change non-dairy surcharge

1 month ago

I called the number and made my request. The gentleman on the line was in favor of my request and agreed with me. He gave me 150 stars on my account but I can’t find them since I never use my account and don’t shop there anymore.

Last edited 1 month ago by Susan
19 days ago

Dairy is the healthier and better option for the planet. Plant based liquids take more water, land and chemicals to grow killing thousands of animals insect and poisoning the water ways and land. Plant based options do not have all the nutrients we need as humans. Also aren’t plant based eaters always saying we shouldn’t be drinking milk as no animal does so why would they want an alternative similar option. It is better to change more for plant based options.

19 days ago
Reply to  Clover

Charge more for plant based options.

8 days ago

1) this has been ongoing for years. Someone finally noticed? Did you also notice no pumpkin scones after Sept? How about no snowman cookies after November?

This is what Starbucks has been doing for 15 years now and yall just now noticing?

2) I’m sure it’s real hard to stop charging people extra $ for a different milk. Might take 5 years to figure put how to roll out that change.

If you love corporatocracy then by all means keep drinking that Kool aid… I mean Starbucks

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x