Public Oppose Australia's Potential Ban On Plant-Based Meat Labels 'Consumers aren't getting confused by them, and there's now actual evidence to prove that' - Media Credit: Adobe. Do not use without permission.

EXCLUSIVE: Nearly 90% Of Public Oppose Australia’s Potential Ban On Plant-Based Meat Labels, New Poll Finds

The data comes from a poll of more than 6,000 respondents, conducted by Plant Based News...


2 Minutes Read

Nearly 90 percent of the public oppose Australia’s potential ban on plant-based meat labels.

The data comes from a poll of more than 6,000 respondents, conducted by Plant Based News

Exclusive poll

A staggering 5,458 participants voted against the proposal to prohibit plant-based products using labels such as ‘mince’ and ‘sausages’. 

The poll comes after Queensland Senator Susan McDonald pushed for an official inquiry into Australia’s labeling laws.

She argues the meat industry should have ‘sole use of product names that have meant only one thing for centuries’.

According to 7News, McDonald added: “If you prefer tofu over T-bone, then you go for it – but forget the ethics of eating animal products.

“This is about protecting a highly valuable industry… And also providing a clear distinction between the real thing and the alternatives so consumers know exactly what they’re getting.”

A similar bill was also approved in Texas last month. House Bill 316 calls for meat labels to be strictly defined as ‘any edible portion of a formerly live and whole cattle/ chicken carcass’; not derived by ‘synthetic or artificial’ means.

Plant-based meat labels

However, new research conducted by Cornell University has busted the myth that plant-based descriptors confuse consumers.

It found ‘consumers are no more likely to think that plant-based products come from an animal if the product’s name incorporates words traditionally associated with animal products than if it does not’.

Moreover, it argues ‘omitting words traditionally associated with animal products from the names of plant-based products actually causes consumers to be significantly more confused about the taste and uses of these products’. 

‘A desperate last hit’

Klaus Mitchell is the Founder of Plant Based News. Speaking about the poll, he said: “It’s nice to see the overwhelming majority of people recognize plant-based meat labels aren’t causing an issue. 

“Consumers aren’t getting confused by them, and now there’s actual evidence to prove that.

“These bills put forward in Texas and Australia are a desperate last hit from the meat industry. But even they can’t deny the roaring success of plant-based meat products.”

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.


The Author

Liam Gilliver

Liam is the former Deputy Editor of Plant Based News. He has written for The Independent, Huffington Post, Attitude Magazine, and more. He is also the author of 'We're Worried About Him'.

More by Liam Gilliver iconography/arrow-right


Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Notify of

Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Luke Wyeth
Luke Wyeth
1 year ago

Senator Susan McDonald is an LNP politician based in Townsville. I don’t think she has anything else better to do apart from lobby the dark side.
If the survey was completed in Townsville you wouldn’t expect anything less.

Fact about Townsville
Julian Assange was born there.

1 year ago

If only they required the meat industry to use, “edible portion of a formerly live and whole cattle/chicken carcass” on their labels!

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x