Texas Approves Bill Banning 'Meat' And 'Beef' Labels On Plant-Based Food - Plant Based News
Texas Approves Bill Banning 'Meat' And 'Beef' Labels On Plant-Based And Cell-Cultured Food Do plant-based labels actually confuse consumers? The evidence suggests not - Media Credit: Adobe. Do not use without permission.

Texas Approves Bill Banning ‘Meat’ And ‘Beef’ Labels On Plant-Based And Cell-Cultured Food

The bill strictly defines beef and chicken as 'any edible portion of a formerly live and whole cattle/chicken carcass, not derived by synthetic or artificial means'


2 Minutes Read

Texas has approved a bill seeking to ban ‘meat’ and ‘beef’ labels from being used on plant-based and cell-cultured food.

House Bill 316 was okayed by lawmakers earlier this week to prevent brands ‘misleading’ consumers.

‘Meat’ and ‘beef’ labels

The bill strictly defines ‘beef’ and ‘chicken’ as ‘any edible portion of a formerly live and whole cattle/ chicken carcass, not derived by synthetic or artificial means’. 

Similarly, it says the label ‘meat’ must not contain any lab-grown, cell-cultured, insect, or plant-based food products. 

The bill stirred controversy online, with a slew of social media users criticizing the meat industry’s influence.

‘The work of lobbyists’

Journalist and analyst Luke Thomas wrote: “The legislative effort to make the word ‘meat’ legally unavailable to plant-based products is entirely the work of the lobbyists for meat providers.

“It has no other genesis or explanation. It’s just rich companies lobbying to get the government to harm their competition.

“No one is confused almond milk or Impossible meat is cow milk or cow meat. They seek it out precisely because it’s an alternative choice TO milk or meat. 

“Not to mention first Amendment issues here… But, there’s no strong legal case to ban the use of those words for consumer benefit.”

Do plant-based labels confuse consumers?

Earlier this year, a study busted the myth that consumers are confused by ‘meat’ and ‘milk’ labels on plant-based products.

The empirical study – conducted by Cornell University – has been published in the Journal of Animal and Environmental Law. 

It found ‘consumers are no more likely to think that plant-based products come from an animal if the product’s name incorporates words traditionally associated with animal products than if it does not’.

Moreover, it argues ‘omitting words that are traditionally associated with animal products from the names of plant-based products actually causes consumers to be significantly more confused about the taste and uses of these products’. 

You can read the full bill here

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.


The Author

Liam Gilliver

Liam is the former Deputy Editor of Plant Based News. He has written for The Independent, Huffington Post, Attitude Magazine, and more. He is also the author of 'We're Worried About Him'.

More by Liam Gilliver iconography/arrow-right


Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Comments [4]  
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x