People holding signs at a climate rally held in response to the Supreme Court's decision earlier in the day curbing the EPAs ability to regulate carbon emissions. June 30, 2022, New York City, New York, United States: People holding signs at a climate rally held in response to the Supreme Court's decision earlier in the day curbing the EPAs ability to regulate carbon emissions. - Media Credit: © Michael Brochstein/ZUMA Press Wire

US Supreme Court Limits EPA Powers To Reduce Carbon Emissions

The Environmental Protection Agency is the latest victim of a Supreme Court ruling

By

2 Minutes Read

The US Supreme Court is limiting the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its ability to curb greenhouse gas emissions.

The US is one of the world’s biggest polluters. According to Carbon Brief, it is responsible for more than 20 percent of global CO2 emissions since 1850, which is the largest share of historical emissions.


But, due to the new ruling, President Joe Biden and the EPA are going to have a difficult time reducing US emissions.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled on a case brought by West Virginia against the EPA. The former argued that the latter does not have the authority to limit emissions across whole states. The Supreme Court sided with West Virginia, limiting the EPA’s abilities to regulate power plant emissions.

The case was also supported by 18 other states, most of them Republican-led. They expressed concerns that they would suffer financially if forced to move away from coal. Some of the US’ biggest coal companies also supported the case.

The coal industry is a significant contributor to the climate crisis. In 2020, global coal combustion produced more than 13 billion metric tonnes of carbon dioxide.

‘Condemning everyone alive today’

Environmental lawyers, activists, and scientists have labeled the Supreme Court’s ruling “devasting.” 

It comes just one week after the court overturned Roe v. Wade, a decision that protected the right to choose to have an abortion.

“At this point, for those in positions of high power to deny the urgency and the stakes of the climate crisis is to condemn everyone alive today and generations to come to life in a sick and impoverished world,” Ginger Cassady, executive director for environmental organization Rainforest Action Network, told the Guardian.

Biden himself has also expressed disappointment with the Supreme Court’s decision.

He said: “While this decision risks damaging our nation’s ability to keep our air clean and combat climate change, I will not relent in using my lawful authorities to protect public health and tackle the climate crisis.”

Greenpeace maintains that Biden can do more to help the environment by declaring a climate emergency.

“Declaring a Climate Emergency would be the beginning of the end to the era of fossil fuels and climate destruction,” the environmental organization states. “By using his executive powers, President Biden can repair the harm caused by environmental racism and deliver good-paying union jobs, justice, and clean energy for all.”

Greenpeace has set up a petition, asking Biden to declare a climate emergency as soon as possible. Add your name here.

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.

heading/author

The Author

Charlotte Pointing

Charlotte writes about sustainable beauty, fashion, and food. She spent more than 4 years editing in leading vegan media, and has a degree in history and a postgraduate in cultural heritage.

More by Charlotte Pointing iconography/arrow-right

heading/comments

Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
buttons/scroll-to-top/scroll-to-top-small-active
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x