I see it
nearly every day – on hashtags, t-shirts, and prints from talented vegan artists. ‘Cruelty-free’, I would argue, is among the most overused expressions in the
In fact, it’s
my belief that it’s time for it to be dropped all together.
There are a
number of reasons why I feel this way – but they all link back to the fact that
it’s usually inaccurate.
slap this verbiage onto just about any vegan food which, sadly, emphasizes the
rights of animals while marginalizing exploited peoples.
The fact of
the matter is that, just because a meal or snack is vegan, doesn’t mean it’s
cruelty-free and to pretend that it is is short-sighted, weakens our arguments,
and leaves us open to criticism.
demonstrated by the uproar that resulted when YouTuber Kalel recently confessed
to regularly eating dairy despite identifying as ‘vegan’, language is
call something cruelty-free while overlooking the fact that it is the product
of exploitive industries in developing nations we leave ourselves open, as advocates,
to detracting from our own message.
having a conversation about animal liberation and reducing harm, we end up having
a conversation about human rights which – while equally important – detracts
from the topic at hand.
term ultimately perpetuates the idea that once a person goes vegan, and stops
investing in industries that are by-nature exploitive, they’ve ascended to a
higher moral plane and are beyond reproach.
isn’t true. Capitalism is destructive, consumerism is destructive, and animal
agriculture is not the only cruel industry in existence.
ourselves, other people, and animals a disservice by acting like it is.
a great place to start – but it’s not the finish line.
fool ourselves into thinking that it is.