vegan hypocrisy The Op-Ed slammed soy for its environmental impact, despite soy production being heavily tied to animal agriculture - Media Credit: Adobe. Do not use without permission

Headline Calling Out Vegan ‘Hypocrisy’ Branded ‘Lazy Journalism’ By Health Expert

The Independent published an Op-Ed arguing vegan aggression and hypocrisy is damaging the movement - but are the claims valid?

By

2 Minutes Read

Matilda Martin’s article in the Independent on vegan aggression and hypocrisy damaging the movement only served to reinforce incorrect negative ideas about veganism.

She says getting the right nutrients can take more time, energy, and sometimes money and cites vitamin B12 as an example. But, B12 deficiency in the UK is not uncommon among meat-eaters.

In the US, everyone aged over 50 is advised to take a supplement as absorption from food declines with age. Farmed animals in the UK are given B12 supplements as levels in their food are insufficient. Yes, vegans should take B12, but it’s cheap and easy and sets up a good habit for when we age.

‘Vegan hypocrisy’

Martin talks about vegan hypocrisy and says ‘soy-based products (poster foods of the vegan diet) are hugely damaging to the environment and have a massive carbon footprint’.

She quotes the WWF voicing concerns over global soya expansion but misses the entire point. WWF says only “six percent of soybeans are eaten directly [by people].” The vast majority of soya produced is used for animal feed so that people can eat meat.

The big players in the global soya market, according to the non-profit, are: Cargill, JBS, Tyson Foods, Kraft Foods, Unilever, and Nestle – get the picture?

Protect the planet, eat less meat

Failing to notice this and blaming vegans eating tofu is lazy journalism. If you want to see less soya expansion, less deforestation, less biodiversity loss, and less global warming, you should eat less meat.

Research from Oxford University found that meat, farmed fish, eggs and dairy use 83 percent of the world’s farmland and contribute more than 50 percent of food’s greenhouse gas emissions, but provide only 37 percent of our protein and 18 percent of our calories.

Going vegan, they found, would cut your food emissions by half. So convinced was the author of this report, environmental researcher Joseph Poore, that he went vegan himself.

The future of the planet is at stake and scientists agree, substantial dietary change is needed.

Plant Based News has contacted the Independent for comment

This article was republished with permission from Viva! You can read the original piece here

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.

heading/author

The Author

Liam Gilliver

Liam is the former Deputy Editor of Plant Based News. He has written for The Independent, Huffington Post, Attitude Magazine, and more. He is also the author of 'We're Worried About Him'.

More by Liam Gilliver iconography/arrow-right

heading/comments

Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mid-Wales Vegan
Mid-Wales Vegan
1 year ago

The mainstream media seems to get away with misreporting veganism simply because doing so confirms the bias of the majority of readers/consumers; sloppy journalism goes unchallenged, for the most part, which is why this sort of rebuttal is so important.

MaryFinelli
MaryFinelli
1 year ago

Many advertisers like seeing veganism trashed by mainstream media, too.

buttons/scroll-to-top/scroll-to-top-small-active