The supreme court has sided with Nestle and Cargill in a child slavery case Nestlé protests it is 'unwavering' in it's 'dedication to combating child labor in the cocoa industry' - Media Credit: Adobe. Do not use without permission.

Nestlé And Cargill Win In Child Slave Labor Suit, Supreme Court Rules

By

2 Minutes Read

The US Supreme Court has sided with food giants Nestlé And Cargill in a trafficking case, despite claims they knowingly bought cocoa beans from African farms that used child slave labor.

Six plaintiffs laid out claims they were trafficked and enslaved as children, and that the corporations ‘knew or should have known’ about the illegal activity in their supply chains. 

Child slavery case

The respondents, who are from Mali, claimed the child slavery took place along the Ivory Coast – which produces tonnes of cocoa every year.

Moreover, they said the companies made ‘major operational decisions’ and aided and abetted in the forced labor.

A spokesperson for Nestlé said the corporation had ‘never’ engaged in the child labor alleged in the suit, Reuters reported.

They added: “We remain unwavering in our dedication to combating child labor in the cocoa industry.”

Additionally, a Cargill spokesperson said: “We do not tolerate the use of child labor in our operations or supply chains and we are working every day to prevent it.”

Nestlé and Cargill suit

In order for a case to be raised under the 1789 Alien Tort Statute, citizens must show the conduct took place within the US.

But the court threw out the case eight-to-one. 

It was already dismissed twice in the early stages before being brought to the ninth circuit. At a hearing in December, the Trump administration also backed Nestlé and Cargill.

However, one of the plaintiff’s lawyers, Paul Hoffman, insisted a lawsuit will be refiled.

He said the ruling ‘delayed our clients’ long quest for justice’.

Moreover, he noted it was ‘significant’ that the court ‘rejected the most extreme arguments for limiting human rights cases’, the Reuters report added.

The case is Nestle USA v. Doe I, 19-416, and Cargill Inc. v. Doe I, 19-453

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and you can help by supporting our work today.

heading/author

The Author

heading/comments

Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
buttons/scroll-to-top/scroll-to-top-small-active