'Ineffective' UK Cull Puts £50 Price Tag On Badgers' Heads
Over 19,000 badgers died last year in the name of protecting animal agriculture profits - Media Credit:

‘Ineffective’ UK Cull Puts £50 Price Tag On Badgers’ Heads


1 Minutes Read

government has confirmed an expansion of its controversial badger cull program,
now offering £50 per a badger killed throughout most of the country.


The cull –
which was called ‘ineffective’ by top researcher Professor Lord John Krebs in
2011 – is justified by the fact that badgers contribute to the spread of bovine

on the cull, one government representative referred to bovine bTB as ‘the
greatest animal health threat to the UK’
– but made no recorded mention of Krebs’ 2011 findings or the estimated 40 million animals killed in UK agriculture


As of May
1, roughly £800,000 had already been spent in Cheshire County alone, with an
estimated expense of £50 million nationwide.

spokesperson for anti-cull group Wounded Badger Patrol said:
“During a time of
economic austerity it’s shocking that not far short of a million pounds of
taxpayers’ money can be found to police the government’s badger cull in


rights groups have urged the government to end the cull – which was the cause
of over 19,000 badger deaths in 2017 alone, and was referred to by Badger Trust conservationist Dominic Dyer as ‘the most expensive wildlife destruction policy in British history’.

representative David Bowles said:
 “We agree action is needed to deal with bTB,
but culling badgers is not an effective way to achieve this.

“The cull
is inhumane, ineffective and costly.”

Millions around the world trust Plant Based News for content about navigating our changing planet & our role in it.

Our independent team of journalists
and experts are committed to making an impact through a wide range of content—and
you can help by supporting our work today.


The Author


Leave a Comment

Plant Based News Comment Policy

In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.

Comments [0]